February 28, 2012
7

I refuse to believe I’m crazy; Grave Encounters is fucking scary.

Like, really, genuinely scary. Fright is certainly a subjective thing, and many factors figure in to my extreme reaction to this 2011 found footage movie. But even with all the baggage I carried into my viewing, I still assert this film is infinitely more effective than say… Paranormal Activity.

Based on TV shows like Paranormal State and Ghost Adventures, Grave Encounters follows a group of “ghost hunters” as they explore a “haunted” mental hospital. As a regular viewer of Ghost Adventures, I was immediately sold. The beginning of this film is a solid parody. Host and lead, Lance Preston (Sean Rogerson), channels  Zak Bagans to hilarious effect. It’s clear that the filmmakers had a firm grasp on the reality ghost TV formula. 20 minutes in and I was set on enjoying the experience, whatever it ended up being.

The camera angles and cuts mirror the actual shows the film is playing off. It is this mimicry that manipulates. If you watch enough of these ghost shows, you know the deal. Sure, something may move, kinda. And someone may shriek that they’ve seen something and take off running. But all the things we fear never materialize. As eerie the setting and circumstance, there is never a payoff. So when things start going down during this faux ghost hunt, you are more than ready to buy it.

Things start off subtlety enough: Windows open, someone’s touched, and all this is frightening. And yes, it works so well because it is taking the next natural step, exploiting our vulnerability. Like clock work, things begin to escalate. And while certain turns may be predictable, the tension and atmosphere manipulates that predictability.

There are certain aspects I found especially frightening and nightmare inducing, but I truly don’t want to spoil this. I didn’t know what to expect going in, and that served me well. As things reach a head, I could see some viewers checking out. A few of the visuals are less than subtle and pretty CGI heavy. But by the time they showed up, I was a wiggly mess. A kitten could have run at the camera and I would have hollered. So none of these effects caused me to roll my eyes judgmentally.

The long and short of it is this: I have never been so frightened in my adult life. Towards the film’s end I was covering my eyes, looking off to the side, and checking my phone. It was just too much. I haven’t felt that sublimely disturbed since I snuck downstairs and tucked myself behind the couch to secretly watch A Nightmare on Elm Street.

The set-up was as perfect as the execution. This is truly found footage at its best. The cameras and filming always made sense, as did the character reactions. I can’t say enough good things. I loved this awful, scary, exploitative movie.

Oh, and it’s on Netflix instant.

Author |

Christine enjoys obsessing over Paracinema. She also loves well written hour long TV dramas. Her free time is spent with her many boyfriends: Brian De Palma, Edgar Wright & Alfred Hitchcock.
  • http://joehumphrey.com/journal Joe Humphrey

    My issue is that when we celebrate poorly made, awful films just because they scare you, it reinforces the notion that genre movies are crappy movies and not worth serious consideration. I think we can all agree that there are really good movies in the horror genre, that could stand up to any other movie on equal ground… but because we elevate crappy movies to the same status as a well made movie in same genre, no one outside of genre fans take these movies seriously.

    If all drama films were judged by whether or not they could make you cry, then Marley and Me would be considered a masterpiece rather than just a manipulative, pandering mess. I just think we can do better, as fans, to ask for more than just “scare me” from these films.

    • Christine

      But I didn’t find this to be a “poorly made, awful” film.
      I thought it was a fun, well done parody of Ghost Adventures. I enjoyed all aspects of it.
      I agree with some of what you assert in your writeup. Our overall opinion of the film was just different.

      • http://joehumphrey.com/journal Joe Humphrey

        I was just going by what you said “I loved this awful, scary, exploitative movie.”

        • Christine

          Oh!
          I meant “awful” as in it was painful and made me want to cry. Not “awful” as in shitty.
          That makes total sense now.

          • http://joehumphrey.com/journal Joe Humphrey

            Ahh.
            The ending really didn’t ruin it for you? Seriously?! Just throwing in random occult images completely out of context and directly stealing that shot from House on Haunted Hill?

          • Christine

            The ending was certainly not ideal. But I was so vulnerable at that point, and the film had done so much right, that it didn’t phase me.
            Looking back (and reading your post) I can see the faults. But it doesn’t change my feelings and the experience I had.

          • http://joehumphrey.com/journal Joe Humphrey

            Oh well.