Behind the Green Door is my first foray into “Golden Age” porn. I chose it for all the reasons listed on its Wikipedia page. Simply put, it’s one of the first, and one of the biggies. This feature length film from 1972 introduced a mainstream audience to pornography, and they enjoyed it. I felt it was a good place to start since, up until now, I have only covered modern, mainstream, parody releases. Quickly, I’ll explain my reasons for that choice as it is in direct correlation to why this film is being covered here.

The decision to analyze porn parodies was made because I wanted to see how modern pornography handled a ready-made plot.  It’s as if most of the work was done for them. Characters, settings and situations all existed and many of the viewers would come with their own knowledge to fill in any blanks. Naively, I thought this existing source material would yeild a porn film with a plot, something that could be watched from beginning to end. I learned very quickly that this is not the case. Just because the source material is a cohesive film, the same can’t be said for the end product. What many of these porn parodies give us is the antithesis of what is presented in Behind the Green Door, a film with little plot.

Marilyn Chambers is kidnapped and used as the center of a surreal sex show. The film’s hour and change run time is filled with the result of that painfully simple setup. Unlike many modern porn films (even those with “built in plots”) BtGD can be watched from beginning to end. Taking place on one static set, the sex manages to be entertaining without ever being “extreme.” (I place extreme in quotes because, at the time, interracial and lesbian sex was extreme to many.) There are no by-the-book,  loosely strung together scenes taking place in varying locations. The sex takes place in real time and involves “real” people. The act appears mysterious and alluring when the sharp lighting, deliberate angles and couch are removed.

This films succeeds as a film because it is infinitely watchable. There is very little dialogue and a simple setup, but BtGD is presented to the viewer as a movie that includes sex, not a sex movie. This distinction is what makes attempting to view modern porn as viable cinema difficult.

BtGD plays like an experimental film, with a 7 minute, slow-motion ejaculation scene, jazz music to punctuate key moments, bizarre costuming, and kinky sex. It plays like an experimental film, because that’s what it is, and that’s what makes it a perfect entry in the “porn as paracinema” series.

Check out previous entries in this series: Official Psycho Parody & The Breakfast Club: A XXX Parody 

Author |

Christine enjoys obsessing over Paracinema. She also loves well written hour long TV dramas. Her free time is spent with her many boyfriends: Brian De Palma, Edgar Wright & Alfred Hitchcock.
  • http://toxic-graveyard.com Uncouth

    If you haven’t already, check out the doc, Inside Deep Throat. Its a great doc that perfectly captures the sense of danger in making adult films in the 70s. Its a pretty wild story that I can’t believe happened in America. Back then the law hadn’t officially ruled on the legality of pornography and where it could be shown. it would def make a great addition to your series.

    • http://joehumphrey.com Joe Humphrey

      Agree.

      I would also suggest Wadd: The Life and Times of John Holmes.

    • http://www.paracinema.net Christine

      Noted! Now I have new things to be on the lookout for! Many thanks, guys!

  • http://joehumphrey.com Joe Humphrey

    I’m a big fan of Insatiable, which also starred Marilyn Chambers. It was a little less arty than Behind the Green Door, and more of a straight up porno movie, but it’s hot as hell and it still plays as a movie in its own right. Worth checking out for sure.

    • http://www.paracinema.net Christine

      Joe- Thanks so much for stopping by and supporting this feature. I really appreciate both that and the recommendation. I’m adding it to the queue.

      • http://joehumphrey.com Joe Humphrey

        No problem!

        I’m a pretty big fan of 70s porn.

        If you’re looking for more arty porn, The Devil in Miss Jones is pretty pretentious and weird. It’s about a woman who commits suicide (slits her wrists in a bathtub) and then goes through this weird surreal sex morality play with a guy who I guess is the devil. It’s been a while since I’ve watched it.

        The Opening of Misty Beethoven is another old school porno that plays more like a movie than porn.

  • http://mendthiscrack.wordpress.com Andreas

    This is so interesting to think about — I’ve never seen Behind the Green Door, but it sounds like it’s a kind of porn/experimental film hybrid.

    Maybe those experimental qualities are there because porn hadn’t yet become fully mainstreamed, and was still a fairly underground industry, so those gave the movie a shot at artistic credibility? And maybe that’s related to how art films were associated with more explicit sexuality in the ’60s.

    Not sure, but this description is some good food for thought.

    • http://www.paracinema.net Christine

      I’m glad you felt that way too, Andreas. It’s almost too foreign a thought to wrap my head around. I’ve always been part of a culture that viewed pornography a certain way. To see it turned on its ear like this is mind-bending!
      Hopefully, as I continue to watch and read up on the “Golden” stuff, I’ll gain some sort of insight. Right now I feel like it’s a chicken or the egg situation. Was it artistic so that it could be more credible or was it more credible because it was artistic?
      Thanks for your input though. I always appreciate your POV.

  • http://www.goregoregirl.com Gore Gore Girl

    Hurrah! Great review! I’m so glad you got something out of it. I love the point you make about porn with plot often being more generic than older films that are majority sex. There are loads of films I love with very little “narrative” (what does that even mean anyway? Andrew Ross talks about this — the sex acts depicted meet the desires/viewing habits/sexualities of the viewer, and in this space is where some of the pornographic narrative resides.

    BtGD certainly has experimental elements, but I’m intrigued by your “sex movie”/”movie that includes sex” distinction. For me, I think it might set up an unfair binary where the sex movie is inferior to films that include sex. Porn as a genre centres sex as the driving narrative force, so BtGD is in my mind a sex film, but an interesting and almost hybrid example of the genre. Not sure if I articulated that very well. In a nutshell, we risk categorizing films not based on generic content/function but on what “we” believe “porn” and “art” are as mutually exclusive terms. I have observed that if the sexually explicit text is “good” then it’s art, while if it’s bad it’s porn. Sigh.

    Anyhoo, you got me thinking! Thanks!

    Re: Joe. DIMJ is one of my favourite films. Weird? Yes, definitely. Pretentious? Probably. Brilliant? Undeniably! It’s another example of the darker, more arty flicks that features majority sex, but is utterly captivating because 1.the sex functions as a signifier — it means something to the plot/characterization, not like characters using character names and wearing costumes, but where the sex itself is dynamic, meaningful, and integrated; 2. Spelvin’s performance blasts pretty much everyone else out the water; 3. it’s shot and scored beautifully. For me, this film is a must-see-multiple-times.

    I hope you give it another whirl, Joe. :)

    Oh, and of course I heartily second Misty Beethoven. Magical stuff.

    Oh, and easy GGG Top-10er, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann, is just about to get released as part of their Platinum Elite series. Complete and *UNCUT* for the first time on dvd, and featuring interviews w/Georgie Spelvin and dreamy Eric Edwards, plus the usual vigorous booklet full of historical/contextual information. Great stuff. I highly recommend these Elite releases.

    Ok, that was kind of absurdly long…I’m just super excited about this new feature, and I’m enjoying the responses too. Peace!

    GGG

    • http://www.goregoregirl.com Gore Gore Girl

      I failed to mention that Pamela Mann set is being made/sold by Video X Pix. :)

    • http://www.paracinema.net Christine

      Thanks for both the kind words and the awesome input, GGG.
      Regarding the “sex movie”/”move with sex” distinction, I see why such wording may cause concern. I merely meant it as a way to simplify and idea (or more accurately, a thought). While 2 films appear to be cut from the same cloth, they aren’t at all alike, and that is an idea I find difficult to express to someone who hasn’t seen much pornography. When you put it that way, I see how one could appear superior to the other, which was never my intention! Whew! That’s certainly some food for thought.
      Your P.O.V. never fails to amaze me. You’re so entrenched in the subject matter that you seem to have explored it from angles that I’ve yet to give a second thought. It’s almost as if making such a broad statement inadvertently cheapens one (perhaps even both) of the “types” of films I’m speaking about.
      OK. I’ll shut up. But it’s really interesting!
      Now I must see The Devil in Miss Jones. I must!
      <3

  • http://www.goregoregirl.com Gore Gore Girl

    Thanks for the thoughtful reply — I hope you don’t think that I think you’re saying things “wrong” or any such stuff. Your perspective is naturally different from mine, and reading all different perspectives prompts questions, interrogation, and recognition of the seemingly simple questions as perhaps being at the core of the issue. So I really enjoyed your article, and your subsequent comments. Keep it up – I really look forward to these pieces and I’m totally down with your approach to pornographic film’s intersections/tensions with more “legitimate” genre film, paracinema, etc. I just love that y’all are exploring this.

    • http://www.paracinema.net Christine

      No no no! I think no such thing.
      Since you’ve spent so much time immersed in the genre I respect your opinions quite a bit. (Ugh, I’m typing this on my phone.) I just want to make sure I’m doing the genre justice and treating it with respect.
      I’m glad you’re enjoying the posts!